The maximum likelihood method is used to fit many models in statistics. In this post I will present some interactive visualizations to try to explain maximum likelihood estimation and some common hypotheses tests (the likelihood ratio test, Wald test, and Score test).

We will use a simple model with only two unknown parameters: the mean and variance. Our primary focus will be on the mean and we'll treat the variance as a nuisance parameter.

## Likelihood Calculation

Before we do any calculations, we need some data. So, here's 10 random observations from a normal distribution with unknown mean (μ) and variance (σ²).

Y = [1.0, 2.0]

We also need to assume a model, we're gonna go with the model that we know generated this data: $y \sim \mathcal N(\mu, \sigma^2)$. The challenge now is to find what combination of values for μ and σ² maximize the likelihood of observing this data (given our assumed model). Try moving the sliders around to see what happens.

We can calculate the joint likelihood by multiplying the densities for all observations. However, often we calculate the log-likelihood instead, which is

$\ell(\mu, \sigma^2) = \sum_i^n \text{ln} \thinspace f_y(y_i)=$-34.4+-33.6=-68.1

The combination of parameter values that give the largest log-likelihood is the maximum likelihood estimates (MLEs).

## Finding the Maximum Likelihood Estimates

Since we use a very simple model, there's a couple of ways to find the MLEs. If we repeat the above calculation for a wide range of parameter values, we get the plots below. The joint MLEs can be found at the top of **contour plot**, which shows the likelihood function for a grid of parameter values. We can also find the MLEs analytically by using some calculus. We find the top of the hill by using the **partial derivatives** with regard to μ and σ² - which is generally called the **score function (U)**. Solving the score equations mean that we find which combination of μ and σ² leads to both partial derivates being zero.

### Mean

For more challenging models, we often need to use some **optimization algorithm**. Basically, we let the computer iteratively climb towards the top of the hill. You can use the controls below to see how a gradient ascent or Newton-Raphson algorithm finds its way to the maximum likelihood estimate.

Iterations: 0

### Variance

## Inference

After we've found the MLEs we usually want to make some inferences, so let's focus on three common hypothesis tests. Use the sliders below to change the null hypothesis and the sample size.

## Illustration

The score function evaluated at the null is,

$U(\mu_0, \hat\sigma_0^2) = \frac{\partial}{\partial \mu_0}\ell(\mu_0, \hat\sigma_0^2) = -Infinity$

The observed **Fisher information** is the negative of the second derivative. This is related to the curvature of the likelihood function -- try increasing the sample size and note that the peak gets narrower around the MLE and that the *information* increases. The inverse of I is also the variance of the MLE.

$I(\mu_0, \hat\sigma_0^2) = \frac{\partial^2}{\partial \mu_0^2}\ell(\mu_0, \hat\sigma_0^2) = Infinity$

## Hypothesis Tests

We have the following null and alternative hypothesis,

$H_0: \mu = 80 \quad \text{versus} \quad H_1: \mu \ne 80$

The likelihood ratio test compares the likelihood ratios of two models. In this example it's the likelihood evaluated at the MLE and at the null. This is illustrated in the plot by the vertical distance between the two horizontal lines. If we multiply the difference in log-likelihood by -2 we get the statistic,

$\begin{aligned} \text{LR} &= -2[\ell(\mu_{0}, \hat\sigma^2_{0}) - [\ell(\hat\mu, \hat\sigma^2)]\\ &= NaN \end{aligned}$

Asymptotically LR follows a $\chi^2$ distribution with 1 degrees of freedom, which gives *p* = NaN.

Note: The figure is simplified and does not account for the fact that each likelihood is based on different variance estimates.

Written by **Kristoffer Magnusson**, a researcher in clinical psychology. You should follow him on Twitter and come hang out on the open science discord Git Gud Science.

## FAQ

What are the formulas?

This page is still under construction, formulas will be added later. Pull requests are welcome!

How do I cite this page?

Cite this page according to your favorite style guide. The references below are automatically generated and contain the correct information.

**APA 7**

Magnusson, K. (2020). *Understanding Maximum Likelihood: An interactive visualization* (Version 0.1.2) [Web App]. R Psychologist. https://rpsychologist.com/likelihood/

**BibTex**

I found a bug/error/typo or want to make a suggestion!

Please report errors or suggestions by opening an issue on GitHub, if you want to ask a question use GitHub discussions

I'm gonna ask a large number of students to visit this site. Will it crash your server?

No, it will be fine. The app runs in your browser so the server only needs to serve the files.

Can I include this visualization in my book/article/etc?

Yes, go ahead! The design of the visualizations on this page is dedicated to the **public domain**, which means “you can copy, modify, distribute and perform the work, even for commercial purposes, all without asking permission” (see Creative common’s CC0-license). Although, **attribution is not required it is always appreciated!**.

## Contribute/Donate

There are many ways to contribute to free and open software. If you like my work and want to support it you can:

A huge thanks to the **64** supporters who've bought me a **143** coffees!

SCCT/Psychology bought ☕☕☕ (3) coffees

Keep the visualizations coming!

@noelnguyen16 bought ☕ (1) coffee

Hi Kristoffer, many thanks for making all this great stuff available to the community!

Eran Barzilai bought ☕ (1) coffee

These visualizations are awesome! thank you for creating it

Someone bought ☕ (1) coffee

@elena_bolt bought ☕☕☕ (3) coffees

Thank you so much for your work, Kristoffer. I use your visualizations to explain concepts to my tutoring students and they are a huge help.

A random user bought ☕☕☕ (3) coffees

Thank you for making such useful and pretty tools. It not only helped me understand more about power, effect size, etc, but also made my quanti-method class more engaging and interesting. Thank you and wish you a great 2021!

@hertzpodcast bought ☕☕☕ (3) coffees

We've mentioned your work a few times on our podcast and we recently sent a poster to a listener as prize so we wanted to buy you a few coffees. Thanks for the great work that you do!Dan Quintana and James Heathers - Co-hosts of Everything Hertz

Chris SG bought ☕ (1) coffee

Very nice.

@whlevine bought ☕☕ (2) coffees

Thank you so much for these amazing visualizations. They're a great teaching tool and the allow me to show students things that it would take me weeks or months to program myself.

Someone bought ☕☕ (2) coffees

Cameron Proctor bought ☕☕☕ (3) coffees

Used your vizualization in class today. Thanks!

@Daniel_Brad4d bought ☕☕☕☕☕ (5) coffees

Wonderful work!

Gray Church bought ☕ (1) coffee

Thank you for the visualizations. They are fun and informative.

eshulman@brocku.ca bought ☕☕☕ (3) coffees

My students love these visualizations and so do I! Thanks for helping me make stats more intuitive.

Qamar bought ☕ (1) coffee

Someone bought ☕☕☕ (3) coffees

Adrian Helgå Vestøl bought ☕☕☕ (3) coffees

David Loschelder bought ☕☕☕☕☕ (5) coffees

Terrific work. So very helpful. Thank you very much.

Tanya McGhee bought ☕ (1) coffee

@neilmeigh bought ☕☕☕☕☕ (5) coffees

I am so grateful for your page and can't thank you enough!

@schultemi bought ☕ (1) coffee

@giladfeldman bought ☕☕☕☕☕ (5) coffees

Wonderful work, I use it every semester and it really helps the students (and me) understand things better. Keep going strong.

Dean Norris bought ☕☕☕☕☕ (5) coffees

@misteryosupjoo bought ☕☕☕ (3) coffees

For a high school teacher of psychology, I would be lost without your visualizations. The ability to interact and manipulate allows students to get it in a very sticky manner. Thank you!!!

Sal bought ☕☕☕☕☕ (5) coffees

Really super useful, especially for teaching. Thanks for this!

Neilo bought ☕ (1) coffee

Really helpful visualisations, thanks!

Chi bought ☕☕☕ (3) coffees

You Cohen's d post really helped me explaining the interpretation to people who don't know stats! Thank you!

Someone bought ☕☕☕ (3) coffees

You doing useful work !! thanks !!

@ArtisanalANN bought ☕☕☕ (3) coffees

Enjoy.

Someone bought ☕ (1) coffee

This is amazing stuff. Very slick.

Someone bought ☕ (1) coffee

Sarko bought ☕ (1) coffee

Thanks so much for creating this! Really helpful for being able to explain effect size to a clinician I'm doing an analysis for.

@jsholtes bought ☕☕☕ (3) coffees

Teaching stats to civil engineer undergrads (first time teaching for me, first time for most of them too) and grasping for some good explanations of hypothesis testing, power, and CI's. Love these interactive graphics!

@DominikaSlus bought ☕ (1) coffee

Thank you! This page is super useful. I'll spread the word.

Someone bought ☕ (1) coffee

dde@paxis.org bought ☕☕☕☕☕ (5) coffees

Very helpful to helping teach teachers about the effects of the Good Behavior Game

@notawful bought ☕☕☕ (3) coffees

Thank you for using your stats and programming gifts in such a useful, generous manner. -Jess

Mateu Servera bought ☕☕☕ (3) coffees

A job that must have cost far more coffees than we can afford you ;-). Thank you.

Melinda Rice bought ☕ (1) coffee

Thank you so much for creating these tools! As we face the challenge of teaching statistical concepts online, this is an invaluable resource.

@tmoldwin bought ☕ (1) coffee

Fantastic resource. I think you would be well served to have one page indexing all your visualizations, that would make it more accessible for sharing as a common resource.

@cdrawn bought ☕☕☕ (3) coffees

Thank you! Such a great resource for teaching these concepts, especially CI, Power, correlation.

Someone bought ☕ (1) coffee

Fantastic Visualizations! Amazing way to to demonstrate how n/power/beta/alpha/effect size are all interrelated - especially for visual learners! Thank you for creating this?

@akreutzer82 bought ☕☕☕☕☕ (5) coffees

Amazing visualizations! Thank you!

@rdh_CLE bought ☕☕☕☕☕ (5) coffees

So good!

@jackferd bought ☕ (1) coffee

Incredible visualizations and the best power analysis software on R.

Julia bought ☕☕☕ (3) coffees

Fantastic work with the visualizations!

@felixthoemmes bought ☕☕☕ (3) coffees

@dalejbarr bought ☕☕☕ (3) coffees

Your work is amazing! I use your visualizations often in my teaching. Thank you.

@notawful bought ☕☕ (2) coffees

Thank you for sharing your visualization skills with the rest of us! I use them frequently when teaching intro stats.

Cameron Proctor bought ☕ (1) coffee

Great website!

Someone bought ☕ (1) coffee

Hanah Chapman bought ☕ (1) coffee

Thank you for this work!!

Someone bought ☕ (1) coffee

Jayme bought ☕ (1) coffee

Nice explanation and visual guide of Cohen's d

Bart Comly Boyce bought ☕ (1) coffee

thank you

Dr. Mitchell Earleywine bought ☕ (1) coffee

This site is superb!

Florent bought ☕ (1) coffee

Zampeta bought ☕ (1) coffee

thank you for sharing your work.

Mila bought ☕ (1) coffee

Thank you for the website, made me smile AND smarter :O enjoy your coffee! :)

Deb bought ☕ (1) coffee

Struggling with statistics and your interactive diagram made me smile to see that someone cares enough about us strugglers to make a visual to help us out!😍

Someone bought ☕ (1) coffee

@exerpsysing bought ☕ (1) coffee

Much thanks! Visualizations are key to my learning style!

@PsychoMouse bought ☕☕☕ (3) coffees

Excellent! Well done! SOOOO Useful!😊 🐭

Someone bought ☕ (1) coffee

## Sponsors

You can sponsor my open source work using GitHub Sponsors and have your name shown here.

Backers ✨❤️

Pull requests are also welcome, or you can contribute by suggesting new features, add useful references, or help fix typos. Just open a issues on GitHub.

## Webmentions

0 0

## More Visualizations

## Statistical Power and Significance Testing

An interactive version of the traditional Type I and II error illustration.

## Equivalence and Non-Inferiority Testing

Explore how superiority, non-inferiority, and equivalence testing relates to a confidence interval